The opposite of "protection": A fetish for used condoms

Discussion of science topics that don't fit under any other category.
Post Reply
Adriel
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:23 am

The opposite of "protection": A fetish for used condoms

Post by Adriel » Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:36 pm

Using condoms is a good thing. Using used condoms, well, not so much. In a 2009 article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, the British medical author Vincent Tremayne explains the fetish for prophylatics.
Link: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/be ... d-condoms/

cien
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2019 7:29 am

Re: The opposite of "protection": A fetish for used condoms

Post by cien » Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:37 pm

Adriel wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:36 pm
Using condoms is a good thing. Using used condoms, well, not so much. In a 2009 article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, the British medical author Vincent Tremayne explains the fetish for prophylatics.
Link: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/be ... d-condoms/
:shock:

Chandler98
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:09 am

Re: The opposite of "protection": A fetish for used condoms

Post by Chandler98 » Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:38 pm

Adriel wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:36 pm
Using condoms is a good thing. Using used condoms, well, not so much. In a 2009 article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, the British medical author Vincent Tremayne explains the fetish for prophylatics.
Link: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/be ... d-condoms/
Eww...

Kane
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:20 am

Re: The opposite of "protection": A fetish for used condoms

Post by Kane » Tue Jan 22, 2019 1:49 pm

Adriel wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 12:36 pm
Using condoms is a good thing. Using used condoms, well, not so much. In a 2009 article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, the British medical author Vincent Tremayne explains the fetish for prophylatics.
Link: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/be ... d-condoms/
What the heck?

Post Reply